Clip A Guide to the Films of J. Photos Top cast Edit. Chris Pine Kirk as Kirk. Zachary Quinto Spock as Spock. Zoe Saldana Uhura as Uhura. Benedict Cumberbatch Khan as Khan. Karl Urban Bones as Bones. Simon Pegg Scotty as Scotty. John Cho Sulu as Sulu. Anton Yelchin Chekov as Chekov. Bruce Greenwood Pike as Pike. Peter Weller Marcus as Marcus. More like this. Watch options. Storyline Edit. When the USS Enterprise crew is called back home, they find an unstoppable force of terror from within their own organization has detonated the fleet and everything it stands for, leaving our world in a state of crisis.
With a personal score to settle, Captain Kirk leads a manhunt to a war-zone world to capture a one-man weapon of mass destruction. As our space heroes are propelled into an epic chess game of life and death, love will be challenged, friendships will be torn apart, and sacrifices must be made for the only family Kirk has left: his crew.
Beyond the darkness, lies greatness. Rated PG for intense sequences of sci-fi action and violence. Did you know Edit.
Trivia Leonard Nimoy 's final film role and by extension, his final time portraying Spock before his death on February 27, at the age of Quotes Sulu : Attention: John Harrison. Crazy credits There are no opening credits in the film except for the title card, making this the third consecutive Star Trek film that does not list its cast at the beginning.
User reviews 1. Top review. Watch it and ignore the critics! I am not going to reveal specific details because this film is so new that I am aware that many people still have not had the opportunity to watch it, and I do not wish to ruin their experience. Star Trek - Into the Darkness is mainly a fast paced action film interspersed with scenes of human interest which facilitates the deeper development of the main characters and their inter-relationships.
The phrase 'bonding under fire seems appropriate. I would urge people not to be dissuaded from watching this film because a reviewer cannot see the link between Gene Roddenberry's much vaunted ideals and therefore trashes J. Abrams work. Kirk but also matures Chris Pine as the film progresses. As Roddenberry was closely involved with original Star Trek series I therefore believe that he would approve the direction that Abrams is taking the latest incarnation of Star Trek.
Star Trek - Into the Darkness is aptly named. It is rich in plot detail and exciting to watch. It will have many people sitting on the edge of their seats, willing those embroiled in battle to succeed.
Even the villain stunningly portrayed by Benedict Cumberpatch warrants a certain amount of sympathy from all fair minded people. My advice - Go, Watch - and be thrilled by a brilliant film. We will go and see it again!! Our thanks to all those involved in bringing this to our screen - great job!
FAQ Plot: When the crew of the Enterprise is called back home, they find an unstoppable force of terror from within their own organization has detonated the fleet and everything it stands for, leaving our world in a state of crisis. With a personal score to settle, Captain Kirk leads a manhunt to a war-zone world to capture a one man weapon of mass destruction. As our heroes are propelled into an epic chess game of life and death, love will be challenged, friendships will be torn apart, and sacrifices must be made for the only family Kirk has left: his crew.
Runtime: mins Release Date: 15 May Download Files click on the format to get the list of files. Popups Popunders Advt opens in a new tab. You will have to close it before proceeding. Advt opens in background no closing required and website opens in new tab. Watch it and ignore the critics! I am not going to reveal specific details because this film is so new that I am aware that many people still have not had the opportunity to watch it, and I do not wish to ruin their experience.
Star Trek - Into the Darkness is mainly a fast paced action film interspersed with scenes of human interest which facilitates the deeper development of the main characters and their inter-relationships. The phrase 'bonding under fire seems appropriate. I would urge people not to be dissuaded from watching this film because a reviewer cannot see the link between Gene Roddenberry's much vaunted ideals and therefore trashes J.
Abrams work. Kirk but also matures Chris Pine as the film progresses. As Roddenberry was closely involved with original Star Trek series I therefore believe that he would approve the direction that Abrams is taking the latest incarnation of Star Trek.
Star Trek - Into the Darkness is aptly named. It is rich in plot detail and exciting to watch. It will have many people sitting on the edge of their seats, willing those embroiled in battle to succeed.
Even the villain stunningly portrayed by Benedict Cumberpatch warrants a certain amount of sympathy from all fair minded people. My advice - Go, Watch - and be thrilled by a brilliant film. We will go and see it again!! Our thanks to all those involved in bringing this to our screen - great job! I can boldly embrace both by kitzkats As someone who has grown up with the franchise, watched every show and every movie I've watched the entire DS9 series at least twice! That being said? I even capitalized it I loved it so much.
The action is intense, the friendship deepened between the characters, the twists and turns are a bit predictable at times, but that is reminiscent of the franchise as a whole. I am already excited for the next movie. I tremendously respected and appreciated the ties in this movie to the elements that make Star Trek great - strong story line, deep connection to the characters and a philosophical element.
No so in the new Trek movie. The ideas of friendship, family and humanity are woven through this movie with subtly and I will outright admit I more than teared up during the climactic scene in the engine room.
EVEN though I had already figured out what was going to happen, I have already come to care about, respect and enjoy the new actors in their iconic roles. So yes, ten out of ten.
And let the haters, hate. Those who can not embrace change can go sit and watch old Star Trek reruns and bemoan the 'good old days' and spout off all the reasons why 'Star Trek ain't what it used to be'!!!!
I, on the other hand, will boldly go and embrace the new with a continued reverence for the old. This movie makes it possible to love both. Easily one of the best Star Trek Movies ever. Its great for regular non fans too.
I will not spoil it but the story is a very good movie, contemporary and of its time without being irreverent to the prime universe. In fact there are so many nods to the original series it seems that JJ actually must listen to fans of the genre. No spoilers here, but even if you have seen the trailers there will be surprises for all but the most analytical fans. An inventive, unpredictable, mesmerising space voyage! The acting was great all round, especially Cumberbatch - wow, he was superb.
The direction, cinematography and visual effects were all greatly innovative and brilliant; the screenplay fun, often humorous and has a lot of heart for all its characters which are all really well developed. Abrams' lens flares helped create more realism in a lot of the scenes despite the fact he often overuses of them. The villain was very interesting and the development, dialogue and motivations of his character were very convincing and inventive, Cumberbatch's fantastic acting greatly helped bring this character to life.
Overall, a mesmerising film with nice homages to the original series, one filled with heart, grace, innovation, superb characters and acting and some impressive, clever visuals and immersive 3D, one of the only times I can say that. Up there with the one, not sure which I prefer, possibly the previous one largely due to the more clever story, despite this one having a much better villain, still not sure though. Still a very strongly recommended film, may hit my top simply because how much I was impressed by it.
Not as good as the first, but still great! It was in my eyes close to perfection lens flares and all. So this movie had a tough up-hill battle ahead of it. I am happy to report that the writing, direction, cinematography and acting were all terrific. But it's not quite flawless. There are a couple of minor plot holes that distract viewer attention to some degree. Cumberbatch is brilliant.
I won't divulge any spoilers, but I will say that the throw back to the earlier movies is very very clever and well executed. Boldly going back for more of the same - but better! However after a questionable decision on their last mission, Kirk finds himself out of favour with Starfleet command. Enter John Harrison, a rogue Starfleet operative with a taste for the melodramatic and a penchant for things that go boom. Kirk volunteers himself and crew to track down Harrison and bring him to justice but along the way Kirk discovers that not everything he believes in may be true.
The tone remains much the same as the first movie although the secondary characters seem to get a bit more screen time on this mission. Chris Pine is a solid Kirk, displaying the bull-headed nature and incredible ego that Shatner bestowed upon his creation.
Zachary Quinto nails Spock, getting the underlying struggle between his human and Vulcan origins just right. Newcomer to the series, Benedict Cumberbatch has an amazing screen presence, oozing menace yet at the same time capturing the essence of an arch manipulator who is just as deadly with his mind games as with a bomb. The movie belts along close to warp speed and the action sequences are slick and polished.
The interplay between the crew of the Enterprise is entertaining and believable, giving nods to fans of the original TV show as well as keeping things contemporary. There is one moment in the film which Trek fans will either love or hate. I'm not going to spoil it but there is a section of the film where This is near enough the best film that I've seen this year and it pretty much lives up to the hype.
If you loved the first one then you're definitely going to enjoy this. If you didn't like the first movie - what's wrong with you? Go and watch it again and then go and watch this one. Just for the record I saw this in 2D and it looked amazing.
I don't really like 3D so you'll need to check out someone else's opinion on that. A Star Trek film that even non-Trekkies can enjoy Nor had I really watched anything Star Trek related before the reboot. Folks running around in different coloured shirts and one dude in a chair giving others orders never interested me. Same deal with ST I eventually hired it on DVD out of curiosity.
I found it alright, but didn't see the big deal everyone was making out of it. So what compelled me to see the sequel at the theatre? I still wouldn't praise it as much us everyone else seems to, but I think I was more on board with it second time around.
However, with my newfound appreciation for the first film, not to mention the new one including actors I'm a fan of Alice Eve and Benedict Cumberbatch , Into Darkness drew my attention where ST09 originally didn't. I know very little about the Trek franchise other than the basics, but it seems these new films have taken into account those who might not be familiar with all that has come previously, and therefore they cater to new fans and old fans alike.
I was put off by Captain Jerk in the first film especially his treatment of Rachel Nichols' character. While he still has some of that left in him here, he has also grown somewhat. Yes, he still breaks the rules, argues with Spock and gets into fistfights - but he has reason to especially when it comes to not seeing eye to eye with Spock. The clash of personalities between Kirk and "Pointy" is where the heart of these movies lies.
Pine and Zachary Quinto play off each other really well, and at times you can understand Kirk's frustration with the Vulcan.
0コメント